Muslims in Media Statistics / USA

Poll: Americans want fewer refugees – support Trump’s migration cuts

Poll: Majority Want Fewer Refugees, Support Donald Trump’s Migration Cuts


by Katie McHugh
Breitbart, 22 Feb 2017

Another poll shows a majority of voters support President Donald Trump’s executive order curbing travelers from seven terror-exporting countries, and shows that a majority want fewer refugees imported into American communities overall.

Pollsters found that 51 percent of respondents want the U.S. to accept fewer refugees than the 100,000 per year President Barack Obama wanted to import. Trump’s new White House plan trims that number to 50,000 per year.

Fifty-three percent of respondents also support the Trump’s Executive Order banning all refugee resettlement from Syria and freezing refugee resettlement for 120 days, according to the poll, which was conducted for the Harvard Center for American Political Studies by the Harris Poll company. The company is co-managed by Democratic pollster Mark Penn. Forty-seven percent of respondents oppose the new curbs, according to Harris, which did not release details showing the percentage of people who strong support or oppose the curbs.

Forty-seven percent of respondents oppose the new curbs on refugee inflow, according to Harris, which did not release details about the percentage of people who strong support or oppose the curbs. In many polls, the percentage of people who strongly support large-scale immigration is below 20 percent.



A regional judge’s order halting President Trump’s refugee resettlement freeze on Feb. 3 did not affect Trump’s halving of total refugee resettlement numbers. It did, however, lead to a rush of refugees from five of the seven unstable, terror-exporting countries into the U.S. Thanks in part to one regional judge, 60.1 percent of refugees arriving since the ruling are from Iran, Iraq, Somalia, Syria, and Sudan. Over half, or 55 percent, of the 2,576 refugee arrivals are Muslims, including 99.6 percent of Syrian refugees.


The half-million refugees imported since 2009 will cost taxpayers $4.1 billion in FY2017 alone. As Breitbart News previously reported: “$4.1 billion can buy 10,677 new homes for $384,000 each, which is the average price of a new home sold in the United States in December 2016. Or it could buy 170,124 new autos for $24,100 each, which is the manufacturer’s suggested retail price for a 2017 Chevrolet Malibu.”

A total and complete shutdown of all refugee resettlement would save billions, but most of the refugees already living in the U.S. are an economic weight because they are only capable of low-skilled work. They will continue to cost more in welfare and aid than they generate in taxes, so costing American taxpayers at least $3 billion every year. These costs do not include any costs racked up in the U.S. criminal justice system when refugees commit crimes and plot terrorism.

Trump’s popular refugee resettlement freeze has broad support. A Feb. 8 Morning Consult poll found 55 percent of voters supported Trump’s executive order, including 82 percent of Republicans.

Another McLaughlin & Associates poll release Feb. 8 found 57 percent support for a halt of refugee settlement to implement better screening procedures.

A Rasmussen Reports poll released on Feb. 2 found 52 percent of voters favored a freeze on all refugee resettlement until the government could better screen out terrorists, including 57 percent of young voters.

6 thoughts on “Poll: Americans want fewer refugees – support Trump’s migration cuts

  1. Part of the argument for pro-immigration focuses on the ‘humane aspect’ of allowing ‘refugees’, completely leaving out the profound financial and security risks. As others have noted, there is no way to differentiate between a ‘good migrant’ and one with bad intentions. Note that many pictures of Muslim migrants show only women, or women with children, and occasionally pictures of a Muslim couple and their family. Completely absent nearly all Western mainstream media is the unending violence in the Middle East and Africa and not showing any correlation between vast numbers coming into Europe, for example, and how terrorists have embedded themselves into those influxes coming into Europe. The current administration’s emphasis on taking great care is far more sensible that any notion of being ‘noble’ or avoiding the supposedly dreadful label of ‘Islamophobia’.

    No matter how rigorous the standards, it does not seem to take a genius to figure out that those who want in, that is those who aim to inflict injury on the U.S. and Europe, are going to lie to every question which may show that they have terrorist inclinations. If they want in, surely they are not going to volunteer that they are dangerous. I recall seeing one video with an imam stating that if needed, those fighting for their cause can ‘shave their beards’, lie, do whatever it takes to infiltrate and take out the ‘infidels’.

    Here is an excellent article outlining how Switzerland refuses nearly all ‘asylum’ requests, very sensible.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s