Muslims in Government Statistics / USA

U.S. Muslims make up only one percent of the population, but file 40% of workplace discrimination complaints

Corporate America is Allowing Sharia to Creep In

Muslims make up only one percent of the population, but file 40% of workplace discrimination complaints.

CounterJihad, BY Bruce Cornibe · |

 

burka-volleyball

Islamic terror attacks have taken the world by storm the last several months.  From Orlando and Istanbul, to Karrada and Nice, these and many other attacks have made fearful citizens eager to avoid becoming a target of Muslim radicals.  Instead of seeing the need to get tough with jihadism, some individuals see it as a time to make frightened concessions to the Muslim community.  These individuals tend to blame the political environment and the rhetoric of people like Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump for the alleged hostility from Muslims.  Carol Hymowitz and Jeff Green wrote an article for Bloomberg about corporate America’s response titled The Rise of Muslim-Friendly Workplaces in Corporate America.  Even though the authors say the motivations for the more Muslim-friendly working environment are principled, they allude to the pragmatism that undergirds much of the business world.

Even outside of fear of drawing an Islamist attack, avoiding conflict with Muslim employees affects both the company’s ‘inclusive’ image, and its liability to lawsuits by activist groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).  When special interest activist groups put pressure on businesses to give into their demands businesses often (depending on the issue/s) concede rather than face bad publicity. Businesses placating to Muslim demands is one of the objectives of the Hamas-affiliated CAIR. Masquerading as a civil liberties organization for Muslims, CAIR, as mentioned in the video, pressures businesses into accommodating the most trivial of Muslim practices advocated for in sharia law.

For example, defending Muslim taxi drivers that refuse service to individuals with seeing-eye dogs because dog saliva is considered unclean or impure in Islam. In addition, dogs get blamed for repelling angels, annulling prayers, and other stigmas that are inherent in Islamic texts, such as:

Narrated Abu Talha: The Prophet said, “Angels do not enter a house witch [sic] has either a dog or a picture in it.” –Sahih Bukhari 4.54.539

Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people).” I said, “You have made us (i.e. women) dogs. I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away. for I disliked to face him.” –Sahih Bukhari 1.9.490

The authors in the Bloomberg article reveal information that shows the strength of Muslim activism in trying to transform America through litigation – especially that of the workplace to become more sharia compliant.  The Bloomberg article states:

While people who practice Islam make up only about 1 percent of the U.S. population, some 40 percent of religion-based workplace complaints filed with the U.S. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission last year were related to Muslims. The agency has pursued a wide range of disputes, including whether Muslims can be fired for refusing to handle pork or alcohol at work. In many instances, the courts have said they cannot.

It’s shocking that such a small fraction of the U.S. population are exerting so outsized an influence.  What should businesses do – cater to Muslim religious demands in order to avoid complaints?  The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) states, “An employer does not have to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs or practices if doing so would cause undue hardship to the employer.”  Furthermore, trying to pacify sharia compliant Muslims is useless, since sharia is an all-encompassing ideology that dictates not just clothing and diet but includes rules for speech, prayer, banking, commerce, etc. The Bloomberg article gives a short list of how some companies are furthering this gradual sharia agenda:

JPMorgan Chase & Co. provides transportation to mosques, and other places of worship, for employees in offices not big enough to have prayer rooms. Alcohol wasn’t served at a recent party at a New York architecture firm because a new staff member who’s [sic] Muslim wouldn’t feel comfortable attending if it were, according to the office manager, asking not to be named because he’s not authorized to speak publicly about the firm. At Accenture Plc, the corporate calendar is organized to prevent events from conflicting with Muslim holidays, as well as those of other faiths.

In addition, “[o]ne goal of the Horizon Blue Cross and Blue Shield Q&A session in Newark last year was to dispel concerns that Islam is a dangerous faith[.]” Since, when did it become the job of a health insurance network to advocate for Islamic apologetics?  Is that not the job of clerics and believers of the faith?  For that matter, when did employers become a free taxi service to the local “place of worship”?

We have seen accommodations for Muslim employees played out in businesses such as prayer rooms, prayer breaks, reassignments when faced with pork and alcohol products, permitting Islamic clothing and facial hair, and in many other areas. Some U.S. companies are willing to go to outstanding lengths to appease one percent of the U.S. population because some Muslim activists shout the loudest. Corporate America needs to say “No!” to more sharia.

 

 

 

 

24 thoughts on “U.S. Muslims make up only one percent of the population, but file 40% of workplace discrimination complaints

  1. “For example, defending Muslim taxi drivers that refuse service to individuals with seeing-eye dogs because dog saliva is considered unclean or impure in Islam. In addition, dogs get blamed for repelling angels, annulling prayers, and other stigmas that are inherent in Islamic texts, such as:

    Narrated Abu Talha: The Prophet said, “Angels do not enter a house witch [sic] has either a dog or a picture in it.”

    It is hard to imagine anyone in the 21st century having such pre-medieval ideas, the most outrageous kinds of superstitious nonsense. I do hope this is something Trump et al addresses in the upcoming presidency. People in this nation do not meekly submit to fervent beliefs of Quakers or Amish, whose beliefs are for the most part, are innocuous and the kind that does not inconvenience others. There is supposed to be a clear separation of religion and state, it is a primary tenet of our democratic republic.

    A tiny percentage of the population should not be able to insist on altering work places environments. Personally, I think the whole ‘happy holidays’ nonsense goes much too far. Do we prohibit Jews from their Happy Hanukkah? Why shouldn’t Christians (or anyone who enjoys it) be able to unashamedly say ‘Merry Christmas’. Muslims can have their beliefs and practice them in their mosques, certainly the rest of us do not have to kowtow to religious beliefs which are often bizarre, antiquated and as we have seen with jihad, completely incompatible with a free society.

    It is clear that Muslims intent is to alter the laws and very structure of the democracies where they have come to live. I agree with this author of this article, we must say ‘no!’

    Like

  2. This simply makes me see red, I am having difficulty in curtailing my anger. Frankly Muhammad was a madman, pedophile, killer, rapist etc etc. It is time the world woke up to this and the fact that important and influential Banker’s like JPM observe this crap is beyond my comprehension. Ever since I was a kid, old Churchill had just died it was bred into me by my extremely wise adult movers and shakers MOHAMMADISM & ISHMAELI’s were somewhere between desert nomads and people who followed anarchane and Satanic ideology. What is wrong with today’s uneducated generation?

    Liked by 1 person

    • @ Ericka, I found this quote for you and interesting article confirming that Churchill did indeed write these words, confirmed by The Churchill Centre, though they were dropped in a subsequent edition of the book.

      ‘How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

      A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

      Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.’

      http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/churchillislam.asp

      Like

      • Thank you Richard, this is probably what I heard when the grown ups were talking in the evenings over a drink. Used to creep down and listen. Taught me a great deal – I was less than 7 years old.!

        Like

    • JPM goes along with this because they support the idea of technocratic globalist rule by people like themselves, and the New World Order must, of necessity, arise from chaos. By encouraging division and cultural decay, they speed the inevitable societal backlash, which will result in the kind of civil violence that requires the massive, Orwellian response needed to seize the level of control over us THEY desire.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. This statistic about 40% of workplace complaints being lodged by such a small percentage of our population, that is Muslim ‘Americans’, makes me wonder what will happen when their percentage rises from now close to 2% of our population to, for example, 8%? (and hopefully that high a percentage never occurs). It’s obvious that they are doing what they can to use our own system of government against us. I hope there is a court case settled which is agreeable to the idea that businesses cannot and should not be obligated to honor all religious convictions and ceremony even while an employee is at his work.

    There are some things in Wicca that I personally like, a sense of connection to nature, but simply because some Wiccans may want to hug a tree does not mean that a tree hugging ceremony need be honored at a person’s workplace. Or what of a fictitious tribe of people who each day at noon salute the sun for five minutes, and demand that this be a part of their everyday work schedule. Or some Christians may want to hold the cross of Christ and walk around the office space for ten minutes each workday, with the cross held high? If Muslims want to work, they need to conform to what the employer wishes, and also likely the majority of employees.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. We must stand against Sharia law. Companies do not adhere to other employees beliefs or ceremonial convictions. I would not work for a company who favored the demands of sharia law. I know of no company that has a chapel or prayer room for Christians or other religions, although it would be nice. Our country will rue the day that they started bending to the demands of Sharia.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. EVERYTHING and the ONLY thing one needs to know about the Muslim religion/culture in two sentences:

    “In every country where Muslims are in the MINORITY they are concerned with the democratic ‘rule of law’ and minority rights.
    In every country where Muslims are in the MAJORITY there is no democratic ‘rule of law’ nor minority rights.”

    I challenge ANYONE to show a country where this is not true….ANYONE !

    Liked by 1 person

    • Strangely there are some fairly competent non-Muslim scholars who disagree. Of course I realise you are correct and Ghandi, the Dalai Lama, the Pope, HG Wells, GB Shaw, Voltaire, Sarojini Naidu, Leo Tolstoy, Gibb, Arnoud and hundreds of others are wrong, it is just strange, almost as if they had seen a different Islam to what you have.

      “After I have read the Quran, I realized that all what humanity needs is this heavenly law.” “The legislation of Quran will spread all over the world, because it agrees with the mind, logic and wisdom.” – Leo Tolstoy

      “The Islamic teachings have left great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behavior, and inspire people with nobility and tolerance. These are human teachings of the highest order and at the same time practicable. These teachings brought into existence a society in which hard-heartedness and collective oppression and injustice were the least as compared with all other societies preceding it….Islam is replete with gentleness, courtesy, and fraternity.” – H.G. Wells

      “It (Islam) replaced monkishness by manliness. It gives hope to the slave, brotherhood to mankind, and recognition of the fundamental facts of human nature.” Canon Taylor, Paper read before the Church Congress at Walverhamton, Oct. 7, 1887; Quoted by Arnoud in THE PREACHING OF ISLAM, pp. 71-72.

      “Sense of justice is one of the most wonderful ideals of Islam, because as I read in the Qur’an I find those dynamic principles of life, not mystic but practical ethics for the daily conduct of life suited to the whole world.” Lectures on “The Ideals of Islam;” see SPEECHES AND WRITINGS OF SAROJINI NAIDU, Madras, 1918, p. 167.

      “History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated.” De Lacy O’Leary, ISLAM AT THE CROSSROADS, London, 1923, p. 8.

      “But Islam has a still further service to render to the cause of humanity. It stands after all nearer to the real East than Europe does, and it possesses a magnificent tradition of inter-racial understanding and cooperation. No other society has such a record of success uniting in an equality of status, of opportunity, and of endeavours so many and so various races of mankind . . . Islam has still the power to reconcile apparently irreconcilable elements of race and tradition. If ever the opposition of the great societies of East and West is to be replaced by cooperation, the mediation of Islam is an indispensable condition. In its hands lies very largely the solution of the problem with which Europe is faced in its relation with East. If they unite, the hope of a peaceful issue is immeasurably enhanced. But if Europe, by rejecting the cooperation of Islam, throws it into the arms of its rivals, the issue can only be disastrous for both.” H.A.R. Gibb, WHITHER ISLAM, London, 1932, p. 379

      How odd that so many were wrong and it is today’s new breed of bigots who have it right after all. 🙂

      Like

      • I am assuming you are a Rabbi? Tolstoy should have stuck to writing novels! H.G, Wells was an angry Yorkshireman from a tough background! Cannon Taylor clearly sees Islam through rose colored glasses! De Lacy O’Leary obviously a sound Catholic saw Islam for what it was! I am surprised at Sarojini Naidu’s point of view! As for H.A.R Gibb well? Intellectuals frequently get it wrong, they are too out of touch with reality and spend their lives among ‘dreaming spires’ arguing for the sake of arguing I would go as far as to say they are largely ‘Savant’s’!

        Like

  6. Use to work a job where I had a few hundred customers. I believe the percentage of Jews was around 7%. The vast majority of complaints I received, no matter how stupid and inane, were from them. They were a pain in the butt. No Muslims at that time.

    Like

  7. I’m a high school teacher in a certain city in TX that received as a “gift” from Obama a good number of muslim “refugees”. Almost every muslim female student is hardworking, extremely religious, and tells me they want to be a lawyer. Almost every muslim male is immature, lazy, and/or rather dim witted. It has become my theory that liberals love muslims so much because they are not Christians. Anything associated with Christianity will be “law suited” out of existence by the muslims. This is already happening in some Michigan cities where muslims want ALL children to receive a holiday for muslim holidays the same way they are for Christmas even though muslim students are not penalized for being absent during muslim holidays. Welcome to the beginnings of muslim colonization courtesy of the Democrat Party.

    Like

    • I am not surprised at what you find among the female Islamic students? Deep inside of every Muslim female, is a need to be rid of their lazy stupid brothers who are utterly spoiled! The girls further more are not indoctrinated and beaten in the Madrases, as women are just so much cattle! What will change Islam or do away with it all together will be the women, we should support them. Now this is true feminism breaking the yoke of misogynistic Islam. Stupid Christian/Jewish women who have converted have done so, in my opinion because they are not centered. I note how many feminists believe Islam is spiritual? The US is changing and Trump has made a start. As a European I am praying like mad Wilders & Le Penn get into power so we see an end to Merkel’s insane dream of breeding with Muslims (rather raped by Muslim men) to increase the population. There are better ways to achieve higher birthrates, importing Islam is not one of them?

      Like

  8. I like the picture with the western type teazing slut on one side of the net , and the ghost in burka on the other …

    It illustrates very well the fact that both sides got their head up their ass , and of course , hides very well that the Jews are manipulating all of that …

    Good stuff !!!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s