Austria / Belgium / Denmark / Europe / France / Germany / Holland / Muslims in Media Statistics / Netherlands / Sweden

Most European Muslims want Sharia – not European laws

In other words: the claim that they are “escaping” atrocities are actually not true. They want atrocities – plus free house and money.

What exactly is included in Sharia law:

Honor killings
Burning infidels alive
Supremacy/global domination
Limb amputations
Genital mutilation
Death to apostates
Forced conversion
Sex slavery and rape
Women enslavement
Wife beating
Child marriage/rape
Brutality against homosexuals
Bigotry and hatred
Robbery and pillage
Extortion of nonbelievers
Persecution and/or death for blasphemy/atheism
Animal cruelty
Prohibition of music/singing
Destruction of pre-Islamic antiquities
Etc., ad nauseam



Translated with Bing from Swedish to English:

Most European Muslims want sharia

by Ingrid Carlqvist
Dispatch International


A majority of the Muslims in Europe want sharia should have precedence over the secular laws of their European host countries. This according to a new study by WZB Berlin Social Science Center where Muslims in six countries interviewed, including Sweden. A study that should concern Western politicians, according to the researchers.

The study posed three questions to the immigrant Turks and Moroccans in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Holland and Sweden:

  • Do you think sharia is more important to you than the laws of the country you live? (66%)
  • Do you mean that there is only one legitimate interpretation of the Koran that should apply to all Muslims? (75%)
  • Are you saying that Muslims should return to their “Islamic roots”? (60%)

Those who answered Yes to all questions be referred to as “consistent fundamentalists” – and these represent 44 per cent of those questioned Muslims in Europe. The fundamentalist attitudes are as common among younger Muslims among the elderly.

According to the study (conducted as early as 2008, but only now have been published), the situation is worst in Austria. Where 73% of the Muslims replied that sharia is more important than the secular State laws, 79 percent that there is only one correct interpretation of the Koran that apply to all and 65 percent believe that the Muslims to return to their Islamic roots. A total of 55 percent replied by the Austrian Muslims in the survey that they agreed with all three allegations.

The report’s author, the Dutch sociologist Ruud Koopmans says that the study reveals remarkably similar patterns in comparison with other German studies. For example, Muslime in Deutschland (Muslims in Germany) which in 2007 showed that 47% of German Muslims argued that the religious policies is more important than democracy–exactly the same number as in this study believe that Quranic laws is more important than the German laws.

Equally disturbing is that the study shows the significant Muslim hostility towards other groups. For example, 60 per cent of Muslims replied that they refuse to have gay friends and 45 percent say that you can not trust Jews.

Even in these matters is distinguished the Austrian Muslims. 69 percent refuse to have gay friends, and 63 percent say that you can not trust Jews. In addition, said 66 percent of the people that the West is trying to destroy islam.

To have something to compare the response with European Muslims, non-Muslim Europeans was also asked about his position on suspicion of Jews (8 per cent), gay (10 per cent), Muslims (21 percent). 1.4% were opposed to all three groups.

According to Koopmans is Islamic fundamentalism “is not an innocent form of strict religiosity. … While about one in five indigenous Europeans may be referred to as “Islamophobe”, is the degree of anxiety to the West among Muslims — which oddly enough is no words, but may call it occidentofobi [Occident = West] – much higher: 54% believe that the West’s goal is to destroy islam. ”

“These results contradict quite clearly what we often hear, that Islamic religious fundamentalism is a marginal phenomenon in Western Europe and that it does not differ from the degree of fundamentalism among the Christian majority. Both of these claims are obviously false, because almost half of European Muslims want the Muslims to turn back to Islam’s roots, that there is only one interpretation of the Qur’an, and that the laws are more important than secular laws. Among native Christians is that fewer than one in 25 who may be referred to as fundamentalist in this respect. Religious fundamentalism is no innocent form of strict religiosity, which clear the connection with their attitude to people outside the group shows.”

Koopmans continues:

“Both the scale of the Islamic religious fundamentalism and its companion – homophobia, anti-Semitism and ‘ occidentofobi ‘ – should cause serious concern both politicians of the Muslim community leaders. Of course you should not equate religious fundamentalism with determination to support or participate in religiously motivated violence. But given the strong link between it and hostility towards the other groups, it is most likely that religious fundamentalism is fertile ground for a radikaliserande environment. ”

The German newspaper Die Welt writes in a commentary on the study results casting serious doubts about the unbridled optimism of the European mångkulturalisterna, those who claim that Muslim citizens in the long run will be covered by the Liberal, democratic thinking in the Western world.

“The study is not suitable for simple conclusions”, writes the newspaper. “But it must be recognised: democracies must beware of those who believe that a free society is something that must be defeated.”

More and more people in Europe are warning now also for the increasingly aggressive attempt Islamic organizations as OIC (57 Muslim countries) are doing at

Some descriptions of Sharia according to leading Islamic scholars:

11 thoughts on “Most European Muslims want Sharia – not European laws

  1. Eye for an eye,Flog the lesbians and gays ,cut the hands of the thieves,stone to deat the adulteress ,these savage punishment are part of the Babylonians CODE OF HAMURABI 5500 years old.The Egyptians had same punishment for criminals.


  2. Stone to death the prostitute and the adulterer to thrown from the highest building to his death.Muslim man can merry up to four wives and have as many kids.NOTHING CAN JUSTIFY THE KILLING OF A HUMAN BEING,NO RELIGION ,LAW,FAITH, NO EARTHLY POWER.


  3. Apart from everything else … Europe under Sharia Law would mean:
    NO more Flæskesteg:
    NO more Wiener Schnitzel
    Vineyards in France will be bulldozed
    150 years of Heritage Brewing by Carlsberg will be outlawed
    – (and) – the once Iconic Brewery will be rebuilt into a Mosque
    All European women-folk will have to enter a “Miss Wet Burqa” competition
    All European men-folk will have to observe the strict “Baggy-Pants” dress code
    “Muslim (so-called) Offensive Humour” will NOT be tolerated under Sharia Law
    Infidels indulging in this practice will be stoned to death on Sundays in Rådhuspladsen
    An example of this type of thing being:
    Q] – What do Muslim men do during foreplay?
    A] – Tickle the goat under the chin
    ….. and …..
    My son has just asked me why his friends Aziz and Tariq did not get any Christmas Gifts from Santa Clause ….. so I told him. “Son – you are ten-years-old now – so you are old enough to know the truth about Santa Clause – HE FUCKIN’ HATES MUSLIMS”
    ….. and …..
    The school teacher in the mathematics class asks Little Johnny:
    “Little Johnny – If you had four red apples and Mohammed asked you for one how many red apples would you have left?”
    Little Johnny thought about this for a moment – then he answered:
    ….. and …..
    I’m not sure who invented the Halal meat-slicer?
    But I’ll bet that Abu Hamza had a hand in it.
    ….. and …..
    There’s a new book out that looks at what the world would be like if Adolf Hitler had won the Second World War.
    It’s called “Muslims? What Muslims?”
    ….. and …..
    Danish Bacon
    TWO things Muslims HATE
    ….. and (not only but also) …..
    POETRY – that is deemed to mock and ridicule Islam will NOT be tolerated under Sharia Law … here is an example of this type of thing:
    I know a Muslim whose name is Jim
    I really do love throwing tomatoes at him
    Tomatoes are soft and they don’t hurt the skin
    . . . . . . . . . . and finally – with (tongue-in-cheek) apologies to 70’s band “Smokie”
    (Copy and Paste) ___ AND SING ALONG ___ AND PASS ALONG ___

    Allah??? Allah???



  4. Muslims in the West are not asking for Sharia to be the law of the land. The Law of the land is the only law applicable and executable in affairs of the individuals.

    All they are seeking is to let Sharia be available as an alternative to resolve their spousal and contractual disputes between two individuals. That is their prerogative. Indeed, every human, no matter who it is, goes first to their family members and friends for seeking solutions to their problem some will go to their clergy (all religions) and some will appoint a mediator.

    When Muslims go to their clergy, he or she will look up similar situations in the past and guide the couple or business partners to find a solution, since the immigrant Muslims are familiar with the Sharia laws, they may accept it, and if they do, that is good for them.

    The problem is that of trust – when the parties agree to the terms per their Imam/clergy, and don’t abide by it, there is no way the aggrieved party can seek damages for the violations. This is what Muslims are asking, to make that binding.

    Indeed, it would be binding if they go to the judge and say, we have agreed to these terms and conditions per our religious conviction, and seek the judge to sign the order and the court order becomes executable. The judge looks to it as mediator resolved decision and signs it and it will become executable. The right wing Americans are downright stupid and making a bid deal about this, as if Sharia will become the law of the land.

    What Muslims have is Personal Sharia, that is a private relationship between the individual and God. How they pray, worship, fast, pay zakat, how they bury their individuals, marry per the requirement as a religious rite. All of that is a private matter and does not need any regulation or execution.


      • Yeeees block the one person who disagrees with this extremely unscientific survey of the muslim population of western europe…


    • Are your women given lobotomies when they are born? Must be because that would be the ONLY WAY a woman would want to live in your horrible society.

      Long live Lorana Bobbitt!!!!!!!


    • Problem with that is Muslim’s don’t treat women as equals, therefore women in Muslim families, will not have their rights protected. ok if your a, man bad if your a women. Islam looks down on Christians as inferior. If Sharia is ok, than Muslim person can violate a Christian persons rights, without legal recourse. So much for civil rights. You can always convert to Islam your religious values aren’t important.


    • The thing is – Europe made progress precisly because it has put secular law above religious one. Most vivid example of this is question of abortion. Now you propose to reverse the current state of affairs and treat muslims better than catholics. If a catholic beats up his daughter then he is prosecuted and that daughter is put in an appropriate institution. Of course Catholic Church would like it differently. Precisly what you ask is to make a special case if that person is a muslim and treat that guy as his religion wants. Just that such reasoning is anyhow official of some islamic institution makes it obvious that islamic world will never understand Europe and the West in general. There cannot be permission for Sharia to rule any affairs – either within a family or elsewhere. You come to Europe – you have to accept its law. Period. There is no exception even for the religion of majority in here and to make it would mean to have Islam greater power than Christianity in here. Not mentioning that we would end up in people being under whatever law they believe in because then all religions/philosphies would have to be treated accordingly and it would make a laugh of the notion of law itself. Isn’t that obvious?


  5. I say that we “bobbittize” the world; that if under muslim law women are 1/2 a person because they have no penis; then we can “resolve” that. In case you are not getting it look up Lorena Bobbitt.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s